Tax Tips when Applying for a Partner Visa in Australia

Tax Tips when Applying for a Partner Visa in Australia

As of 2016, there are two types of partner visa available to apply for within Australia. There are a variety of criteria that an applicant will be expected to meet and if they are unable to do so, then they may find that their application is rejected. For those in the process of applying, it’s important to note that ensuring that all documents and data are properly prepared can mean the difference between a successful process and a rejected one.

Here are a few tips to help to maximise the chances of being approved for a visa.

Tip One – Download a document checklist

The best way to keep on top of the documents required during an application is by making sure that they are properly arranged and prepared. Document checklists can help with this process and they are highly recommended by immigration lawyers and approval authorities alike. When applying from abroad, it’s easy to overlook a particular piece of paperwork and this can slow an application down – so a checklist can be very beneficial.

Tip Two – Hire the services of an immigration expert

Lawyers and immigration specialists are always on hand to offer advice and guidance. Furthermore, a reputable agent will be able to deal with the submission of documents, as well as handling any correspondence from the Australian Department of Immigration. Studies have shown that taking on the services of an immigration lawyer can increase the chances of success by several times – and having a professional in the country of application can offer its own benefits.

Tip Three – Allow plenty of time before planning to travel

Australia offers a variety of visas to visitors and those hoping to obtain permanent residence. When applying for a relationship visa, it’s a good idea to leave at least 6 months for the application to be sufficiently processed. This can also cater to any delays that may arise from applying abroad, as well as any further evidentiary documentation that may be required as the application is progressed.

It is possible to apply for several visas simultaneously and this can be particularly beneficial for those hoping to remain present within the country for more than a few weeks. Many applicants will bring their documentation with them during this temporary stay, which can help to ensure that evidence can be submitted when necessary.

Additionally, being present can help when it comes time to signing paperwork, as well as being on hand should a citizenship test be required. This won’t be the case with temporary visas – but for those hoping to stay on permanently once approved, it makes a lot more sense to be within travelling distance from a local testing facility.

Nationwide Debt Direct – debt settlement benefits

The Benefits of Debt Settlement


When it comes to debt management options, one of the lesser-known yet effective ways to get your debts under control is debt settlement. Nationwide Debt Direct settlement is as straight forward as it sounds-you settle your debt- but you can either do it outright or over a short period of time, for less. Let’s explore the benefits of debt management, to see if it’s the right debt management option for you.


  1. Get Debt Free- Fast


There really isn’t a quicker way to get debt free than by settling your debts. When you make an agreement with your creditor, you can make a payment of as little as 50% of the overall amount, in no time at all. Once you have set the parameters of your repayment with your creditor and completed the agreed payment, you’re debt free! A Nationwide debt direct debt settlement company can advise you on credit settlement options and get you the best repayment prices, so make sure to do your research.


  1. Save Money


By paying less of your debt’s overall amount you’ll be saving an initial sum of money, but have you considered the money that you will save in the long term? Without a debt to pay, you will no longer owe interest to your creditors, not to mention late fees and any hidden charges that may have been linked to your original debt. This will save you money throughout the course of a year, as well as throughout the course of the initial loan agreement term.


  1. Reduce Stress


It’s no secret that financial troubles cause stress for many of us, and that stress can last for years into the future. As circumstances change, so do our needs and not having to pay off a certain, significant debt can give you some much needed financial backup in the long term. Not having to deal with the stress of paying off a particular debt you can relax, and focus on the more important things in life.


  1. Start Fresh


It never hurt anyone to make a fresh start, and getting on top of your financial situation in its entirety is the best possible way to wipe the slate clean. Other debt management plans may allow you to keep existing credit options, such as credit cards and store cards, but if you are struggling to make repayments it’s not likely to work out for the best in the long term. Declaring bankruptcy is often a solution that has severe ramifications down the line too, so the only way to get debt free and clear the slate is to settle your debts.


So as you can see, debt settlement really is a great way to get debt free without making a mountain out of a molehill, so if you are struggling to repay your debts and would like more information about your debt settlement options, please feel free to contact us at Nationwide Debt Direct today.



Obama tax reform overture grabs K Street’s attention


Getty Images

By Bernie Becker – 10/08/14 06:00 AM EDT

K Street has a message for President Obama when it comes to tax reform: Talk is cheap.

Senior White House officials have started making overtures about a deal to revamp the tax system for businesses next year, arguing it’s one area where there is common ground with the GOP — an important consideration if Senate control flips to the Republicans in November.

But for tax reform to become real, lobbyists say, the Obama administration will have to translate words into action by engaging vigorously with Capitol Hill on the arduous process of crafting legislation.“I hear the happy talk,” said Jade West of the National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors. “Any time there’s talk about tax reform, we react.”

“We’re paranoid. We’ll start lobbying,” added the former Senate GOP aide. “But I just don’t see it.”

On paper, the possibility of a Democratic president and an all-Republican Congress next year would appear to be a promising set-up for tax reform.

The president, facing his final two years in office, would be grasping for an achievement to round out his tenure.

Senate Republicans, staring at an unfavorable 2016 map, would have incentive to find a legislative achievement they could bring to voters in swing and Democratic-leaning states.

And House Republicans would have the chance to tackle an issue that they have long argued should be a priority.

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) made tax reform one of his five pillars for sparking the economy, and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the favorite to take over as the House’s top tax writer next year, has expressed a desire to tackle it head-on.

There’s even bipartisan agreement that the U.S.’s corporate tax rate is too high, the code too riddled with tax breaks and the international system for businesses long overdue for an upgrade.

Republicans have proposed reducing the top corporate rate from 35 to 25 percent, lower than the administration proposed in 2012.

With all that as a backdrop, both Jason Furman and Jeff Zients have talked up the possibility of tax reform being an area of bipartisan agreement before Obama leaves office.

Furman, chairman of the president’s Council of Economic Advisers, said last month that Obama “would certainly love to sign a business tax reform bill.”

Zients, the director of the National Economic Council, went even further, insisting that Obama’s framework to revamp the tax code for businesses was “remarkably similar” to a plan from House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.).

“That makes me optimistic that we can get something done,” Zients said last week.

“President Obama has long advocated for reforming our tax code to make it more simple and fair, and he has been clear that he is willing to work with both parties to get that done,” said an Obama spokeswoman.

“The president has put forward a framework for business tax reform that lowers our corporate tax rate, closes wasteful loopholes, and simplifies the tax code for everyone, and he will continue to call on Congress to take action.”

That talk has piqued the interest of the variety of the business coalitions in Washington pushing for tax reform.

Jeff Birnbaum of the Coalition for Fair Effective Tax Rates said Obama and his aides have only given “lip service” to tax reform in the past.

But Birnbaum, whose has long stressed that an overhaul of the code needs to also help businesses that pay through the individual system, said the interest from Boehner and Ryan, in addition to the comments from White House officials, could lead to something productive.

“That’s a pretty strong combination right there,” he said. “That’s not a bad starting place.”

Some congressional aides said they have seen increased outreach on tax reform in recent weeks from the administration. GOP staffers added that it’s possible Republicans could warm to a tax reform plan that only affects businesses, after having long pushed to reform the corporate and individual codes together.

Jon Traub of Deloitte Tax said it’s tough to say for certain how Obama would react to a GOP Senate; the president could see himself as the last line of defense for Democrats ahead of 2016.

“I don’t pretend to know what he’ll do. It’s certainly possible that he’ll say ‘I want to build a legacy,’” said Traub, a former senior aide to Camp. “Is the environment conducive for a deal? We won’t know that for awhile.”

None of that means that longstanding roadblocks to tax reform have disappeared, especially after Camp’s broad tax reform draft this year found few champions. Several top lawmakers, including Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), have downplayed the chances for tax reform in the next Congress.

Democrats and Republicans remain divided over whether a revamped tax code should bring in more revenue. Obama has sounded open to rewriting the corporate tax system without added revenues, as Republicans have sought, but also wants an upfront influx of revenue to cover infrastructure spending.

The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center recently projected that nearly $840 billion worth of business income was reported on individual tax forms in 2012. Analysts say it would be difficult to craft an overhaul that included both those companies and traditional corporations without revamping the entire individual system.

Plus, as the recent debate over corporate inversions shows, taxes remain a politicized issue. Even as his aides were talking up tax reform, Obama criticized Ryan last week, stressing that the Wisconsin Republican is still seeking to lower the top rate for the highest earners.

Ryan himself hasn’t sounded overly optimistic about the prospects for tax reform, and has even floated officially adopting more “dynamic” scoring for tax bills. The GOP says that would more fully account for economic growth spurred by tax changes, but also would deepen the divide between the parties.

Ken Kies of the Federal Policy Group predicted that Obama would likely have to give ground on some big issues — whether to protect most offshore corporate income from U.S. taxation or lower the corporate rate to 25 percent, for instance — to strike a deal with an all-GOP Congress.

“In order for this to turn into real progress, they’re going to have to come around to some important policy positions that Republicans have on tax reform,” said Kies, a former GOP aide who worked on the 1986 overhaul of the tax code.

But a former Democratic aide now on K Street said that it would be up to both the White House and GOP lawmakers to find more common ground on tax reform.

“At the end of the day, he’s got to sign it,” the lobbyist said about Obama. “But a lot of it’s going to depend on whether a Republican Congress is willing to work with him.”


AT Partnerships News

Can Congress Pass Tax Reform That Would Stop Inversions? – Tax Reform AT Partnerships For Wealth


Conservatives correctly point out that proposals to stop inversions from the Obama administration and Democrats in the House and Senate are only stopgap measures—a mere Band-Aid. If Congress were to tighten the anti-inversion rules first enacted in 2004 and further increase the foreign ownership requirements for mergers that move American businesses’ corporate legal residence outside of the United States, it would stop the type of deals that are now getting all the attention. But we still will not have solved the fundamental problem of tax motivated foreign ownership of U.S. businesses.

Right now the U.S. tax system favors foreign owned corporations over U.S. owned corporations. Although you often hear about the U.S. having a higher corporate tax rate than other major economies, this really has little to do with the disparity between U.S. and foreign ownership. The two big factors that make foreign ownership attractive for tax purposes are 1) that foreign owned firms can pay a lot less tax on their non-U.S. activities (because as non-U.S. firms they are under territorial regimes) and 2) that they can pay a lot less on their U.S. activities (because U.S. rules make it much easier for foreign owned firms to strip earnings out of the United States). Read more

Global tax reform top of the agenda for G20 finance ministers this weekend



The world’s most powerful central bank governors and finance ministers gather in Cairns this weekend for a series of highly charged economic meetings – one of their last chances to discuss as a group the problems afflicting the global economy before the all-important G20 Leaders’ Summit in Brisbane in November.

Treasurer Joe Hockey has been in Cairns for much of the week, meeting with Bank of England governor Mark Carney and International Monetary Fund chief executive Christine Lagarde. The official meetings will start on Saturday.

Mr Hockey has flagged that he wants the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors to focus on tax.

“Hopefully this weekend G20 finance ministers will sign up to an agreed global approach to ensure that companies pay tax where they earn the money,” he said this week. “It’s not an easy outcome, but we are going to work damn hard at it.”

He also wanted to talk seriously about the stability of the global financial system, including the rules for banking and prudential supervision of financial markets.

“We believe that at the G20 we can sign off on a number of initiatives that are going to ensure that banks that fail in the future are going to be held responsible for their own failure and systemically important banks don’t have to turn to governments to be bailed out by taxpayers,” Mr Hockey said.

In the days leading up to the event, the IMF said its attendees must seize the moment and commit to “decisive” reforms to bolster global economic growth.

Global growth had been much weaker than expected in the first half of this year, it said, and desperate action was needed to boost growth around the world.

The call put pressure on the commitment made by G20 members at a similar meeting in Sydney in February to grow their economies by 2 per cent above current projections over the next five years.

Mr Hockey said Australia was on track to hit the target, with stronger employment growth this year, but he was aware of the challenge ahead of him.

On tax and regulation, Mr Hockey said it was “hugely important” to discuss the need to have common reporting standards across different tax jurisdictions.

He said tax authorities needed to know when new bank accounts were being opened so they could tell if those accounts were being used to hide money in tax havens.

“We also hope to finalise the rules in relation to shadow banking … [because] it represents a potential significant threat to the stability of the global financial system.”

Mr Hockey said he hoped to “bring to a close” a lot of the “over-regulation” in financial and banking markets that occurred following the global financial crisis.

Other attendees this weekend include US Federal Reserve chairwoman Janet Yellen and European Central Bank president Mario Draghi. Reserve Bank governor Glenn Stevens and Treasury Secretary Martin Parkinson will also attend.

There are five topics on the agenda: global economy, growth strategies, investment, tax, and financial regulation, with side sessions on infrastructure, international business and civil society.

Read more:

Why we will follow NZ on tax reform



Alan Mitchell | John Howard is not alone in thinking Tony Abbott should be able to emulate John Key’s impressive combination of economic reform and political success.

Read More here

Tax Planning – Why You Need Retirement Planning Assistance

Why You Need Retirement Planning Assistance


Although most people eager look forward to the day when they can retire, few of these individuals are doing all that they can to financially prepare for this time. Getting retirement planning assistance is one of the best things that you can do to gain assured comfort and financial health during your later years. A qualified adviser can help you protect your portfolio from extraordinary taxation and inflation. (see more at


Certain investments are good for long-term savings given that these are guaranteed to stay ahead of inflation. They will have the same overall value when it is time for consumers to rely on these. Others, however, will gradually diminish in worth throughout the years. Although they might seem like solid investments now, the related returns can be greatly diminished by the passage of time.


It is important for people to note that all portfolios must have some measure of risk associated with them. Profit potential is usually directly associate with the amount of risk that an investment entails. Thus, people who want to implement aggressive savings plans for greater comfort and financial health will need to work with advisers who can show them how to mitigate this risk.


Diversification is important as well. Those who are preparing for their retirement years should have a diverse array of investments as this is a great way to mitigate risk and to acquire assured profits. People can invest in stocks, bonds, precious metals. They can also take advantage of the extraordinary profit potential of emerging markets for long-term investments.


If you want to be truly diligent in the management of your retirement photo, you or your advisers should review it once every few years (see comments by Richard Tjiong). This will allow you to reallocate your assets as needed, to address areas of increased risk or profit potential. Moreover, you adviser can use these reviews as an opportunity to help you find further tax shields based upon the most recent changes in tax laws. See more on planning for your retirement at

For more info on Trustee Regulations and the Australian court rulings in relation to this see article by Richard Tjiong at